A Case Against Guardian Angels, And Why We Don’t Believe In Them

Matthew 18:10 “Take heed that ye despise not one of these little ones; for I say unto you, That in heaven their angels do always behold the face of my Father which is in heaven.”

This single verse of the Scripture has been divorced from the remaining 31, 101 verses of it, and made to teach what they want it to teach. But like other verses of the Scripture, no private interpretation may be fixed upon it, for no portion of the scripture is of any private interpretation (2 Pet 1:20). All parts of the Scripture must be reconciled to teach the uniform truth of the whole.

Many hold that there is such a thing as a guardian angel assigned specifically to every little child, to watch over and care for them throughout the time of their infancy, until they have reached what they call the age of accountability. Others hold that the guardian angel continues his mission over them until they grow old and die.

As to the specific work of the guardian angel, and why he is assigned to every child, opinions vary. Some maintain that he is sent to protect them from accidents and death in their infancy; others teach that a guardian angel is sent to labour with the child, to help him in his struggle against sin, and to ensure he is not lost forever. But what saith the Scripture?

Christians are plain men who build their beliefs and practises upon the plain declarations of Scripture. They do not found their beliefs upon conjectures, assumptions, or inferences. They do not follow popular opinions, fables, superstitions, or even their emotion. What then, is there a plain passage of Scripture declaring the ministry of angles, and the person to whom they are assigned? Yes!

Hebrews 1:14 Are they not all ministering spirits, sent forth to minister for them who shall be heirs of salvation?

Let the idea of a guardian angel for every infant be exploded forever! Angels are ministering spirits, sent forth to minister for them who shall be heirs of salvation. The heirs of salvation are the elect of Christ, being those chosen to salvation and eternal life before the foundation of the world (John 15:16; Acts 13:48; Eph 1:3-4; 2 Thesis 2:13). The elect, therefore, are the grand objects of angelic concerns and undertakings. They are those to whom the special privilege of angelic undertaking concerns, according to the plain declaration from the passage in Paul’s Epistle to the Hebrews. When they can prove from Scripture that every little infant is a heir of salvation, we shall buy their doctrine of a guardian angel for every child; but until then, we shall set forth the truth we are convinced of.

“But,” it may be asked, “why then did Christ say that every little child has an angel that always beholds the face of His father in heaven.” We answer, First, Christ never said that every little child has angels that behold the face of his Father in heaven. He said that, we should take heed, that we do not despise one of these little ones – referring to those that believe in him, because in heaven their angels behold the face of his Father. The little ones referred to are his disciples, and all who have believed in him for salvation. Proof of this is to be found in the 6th verse of the same chapter, which is the context from whence the proper interpretation of the whole may be derived.

Matthew 18:6 But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.

The warning was not against offending little children. Of course, no man ought to, for they also have their inalienable rights, both as creatures of God, and as citizens of a nation; but there were another special group of people against whom we must be careful not to offend nor despise, for the punishment that will be meted out to those that offend and despise them will be far worse that anything the imagination of man can conceive of; and these special group of people were the believers – those little ones which have believed in his name for salvation. And though, despite this awful warnings, they have been often despised, offended, persecuted, burnt at stake and thrown to beasts, yet their redeemer is strong, and shall thoroughly plead their case.

It ought not confuse anyone that believers in Christ should be called little ones, for such epithet and appellation perfectly befits them in a world where their numbers are few, and their persons mostly feeble. They are little, in number, compared to the many which despise and often offend and persecute them. They are little ones, compared to the mighty ones and earthly monarchs that daily make unjust laws to oppress them.

1 Corinthians 1:26-27 For ye see your calling, brethren, how that not many mighty, are called:

But God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty;

It was in order to enter the kingdom of heaven, that they stripped themselves of all pride in their own good works, renounced not only their sins but also their personal righteousness, and were humbled with that form of humility peculiar to a child; wherefore, the appellation, little ones, is a metonymic expression to show the manner in which they have received the kingdom of God:

Matthew 18:3-4

3 And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.

4 Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven.

Moreover, it is as little ones that we must give them a cup of cold water, in the name of a disciple:

Matthew 10:42 And whosoever shall give to drink unto one of these little ones a cup of cold water only in the name of a disciple, verily I say unto you, he shall in no wise lose his reward.

We may further prove that the epithet, little ones, perfectly fits the believers, when we consider that Christ refers to the whole multitude of them as little flock:

Luke 12:32 Fear not, little flock; for it is your Father’s good pleasure to give you the kingdom.

Before we say more, we want to notice few things from the portion of Scripture from Hebrews to which we have already made reference.

Hebrews 1:14 Are they not all ministering spirits, sent forth to minister for them who shall be heirs of salvation?

Notice that it says that the angels are sent forth to minister for, not to; but for – for – for them who shall be heirs of salvation. Here, the word, for, is a preposition indicating that the angels are acting in the favour of, and on the side of, the heirs of salvation, which are the elect. And by proper rule of grammar, if the angles of God be ministering spirits for, in favour of, and on the side of, the elect, it necessary follows that they are ministering spirits sent forth to minister against, in the disfavour of, and are not on the side of, the reprobate, whether he be an infant of days, a neonate, a toddler, a teenager, or an adult. We shall bring forth our strong reasons for the latter and for the former.

For the latter, that the angels of God are ministering spirits sent forth to minister against them who are not heirs of salvation, we shall make good from the inspired Scripture, of the numerous instances of God sending out his angels to destroy his enemies, including children and infants, who were not heirs of salvation.

The first mention of angels is in Genesis 3, after the fall of man. No sooner had God cursed them and driven them from the Garden, his angels in flaming fire ministered against our first parents, to keep them out of the reach of the tree of life.

Genesis 3:24 So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.

These were no guardian angels! When God sent Man out of the Garden of Delight (for so Eden signified), he did not assign to him a guardian angel, for man deserved none. What right had they to a guardian angel? Or how congruous would it be that God’s angels should still act in the favour of those who have rebelled from his government, and chosen to themselves the way which seemed right in their sight? Therefore, the first intervention of angels in the affairs of man, was not to minister for him, but against him. If our first parents, Adam and Eve, had guardian angels, where is the proof of it?

We see angels again in the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah; there, not as guarding angels specifically assigned to any infant or adult, but as God’s messengers assigned against them, to accomplish the wrath of God upon the citizens of these wicked nations, and to bring about a complete overthrow.

Genesis 19:1 And there came two angels to Sodom at even …

Did every single child in Sodom have a guardian angel for their welfare and protection? That, indeed, is a thing that cannot be proved by Scripture. Anyone who sets himself to prove such gratifying doctrine must go outside the bounds of Holy Scripture to fetch his proof.

Further in the Scripture, we find an angel of God interposed between the children of Israel and the Egyptians before the Red Sea. To the latter he was no guardian angel, but an adversary, frustrating their motion by a cloud and darkness to keep them from the children of God; but to the other he did minister light by night, making their journey and deliverance unhindered.

Exodus 14:19-20 And the angel of God, which went before the camp of Israel, removed and went behind them; and the pillar of the cloud went from before their face, and stood behind them:

And it came between the camp of the Egyptians and the camp of Israel; and it was a cloud and darkness to them, but it gave light by night to these: so that the one came not near the other all the night.

It cannot be proved any way, from any genuine source, that the Egyptians had a guardian angel ministering in any way, for them; not a single soul, infant or adult, had an interest in the service and ministrations of these holy creatures who excel in strength to do the will of their Maker. All which further serves to prove that “they are ministering spirits sent forth to minister for them which shall be heirs of salvation.

In the case of Balaam, a prophet who had several intercourse with God, for we often read of such expressions as, “And God came unto Balaam, And God said unto Balaam, And God met Balaam, And the LORD put a word in Balaam’s mouth”; but in as much as he was set up as an object of God’s wrath, we do not find him with any guardian angel, whether in his infancy or adulthood; but all that we have recorded of him in relation to an angel, was that the angel of the LORD stood against him as an adversary, and sought to slay and waste him.

Numbers 22:22, 32, 33

And God’s anger was kindled because he went: and the angel of the LORD stood in the way for an adversary against him. Now he was riding upon his ass, and his two servants were with him.

And the angel of the LORD said unto him, Wherefore hast thou smitten thine ass these three times? behold, I went out to withstand thee, because thy way is perverse before me:

And the ass saw me, and turned from me these three times: unless she had turned from me, surely now also I had slain thee, and saved her alive.

Are we to believe that this angel, which now stands as an adversary against Balaam, was at one time in Balaam’s infancy, his guardian angel? Or could it be believed that, due to his impenitence and insubordination, his guardian angel has given way for this second angel to now oppose and seek to slay him? This is essential what the fable of guardian angels means.

On and on we could go, to furnish from the scriptures, that there are no guardian angels for any man, but that there are ministering spirits sent forth to minister exclusively for the heirs of salvation (Heb 1:14). Time would fail us to make mention further instances in Scripture; of an angel slaying 185, 000 in the camp of the Assyrians (Isa 37:36); of Herod the King smitten by an angel for not giving God the glory (Acts 12:23), and many others.

We now come to prove by instances in the Scripture, that the angels are God’s “ministering spirits, sent forth to minister for them who shall be heirs of salvation.”

First, Abraham, who was an heir of salvation by sovereign grace, for him angels did minister on several occasions, as in the case of his pregnant maid, Hagar, who was fleeing away from home with Abraham’s son in her womb. Had not the angel of God interposed her flight, she would have fled away with Abraham’s son, Ishmael, and possibly to return no more.

Genesis 16:9 And the angel of the LORD said unto her, Return to thy mistress, and submit thyself under her hands.

We are aware of the fact that in this instance, the angel ministered, not to Abraham, but to Hagar. She it was that encountered the angel in the wilderness, and heard his voice. But in all these, who can deny that the angel was only ministering for, and in the favour of, and on the side of, the Patriarch, Abraham. The favour of the angelic ministry belongs not to the persons they minister to, but to the persons they minister for; and this is the sense of the words of the apostle Paul in Hebrews 1:14, that they are ministering spirits, sent forth to minister forforfor them who shall be heirs of salvation. So while the angel ministered to Hagar in the wilderness, he was only ministering for, and in the favour of, the Patriarch Abraham, which favour culminated in the preservation of his first son, Ishmael. An angel may minister to one not an heir of salvation, as in the case of the Egyptians by the Red Sea, where he ministered darkness to them to frustrate their endeavours (Exo 14:19-20); and in the case of the Assyrians, where he ministered death to 185,000 of their host (Isa 37:36). Wherefore, this angel was no guardian angel for Ishmael nor Hagar.

Jacob had many ministrations of these kind for his good all through the days of his pilgrimage on earth. They ascended and descended in a continual service for him, according as it seemed good in the sight of God who sent them (Gen 28:12); they spoke to him in dreams and gave him counsel and direction, according to that dispensation of time wherein they lived before the Scripture was delivered to the saints for their direction (Gen 31:11); they met him in a host, and ministered for him before his meeting with Esau, who had nurtured nothing but wrath and revenge in his heart against the Patriarch (Gen 32:1).

The inspired record is complete for us in its record of the history of the lives of Esau and Jacob, but of the former, we have no record of a single angelic ministration or service for him, but of the latter, the Scripture abounds with many testimonies of them. Wherefore? We would be at a loss to answer, had not the Lord told us in plain terms, “Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated” (Rom 9:13).

Read of these ministering spirits sent forth to minister for Gideon in his conquest of the Midianites (Judg 6:11-12); for Elijah (1 King 19:5-7); the Apostles (Acts 5:19); Cornelius (Acts 10:3); Peter (Acts 12:7), and many other heirs of salvation. This, we believe, will suffice for a proof that the doctrine of each single individual having a guardian angel is nothing but a Jeudo-Pagan fable, to be rejected by all who have been taught of the Lord in his word.

Titus 1:14
Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth.

In addition to what we already established out of the numerous instances in the Scripture, of angels appearing to minister personally and exclusively for the heirs of salvation, we provide another plain passage of Scripture similar to what we have in Hebrews 1:14, though this time, from the Old Testament Scripture, in Psalm 34:7.

Psalms 34:7 The angel of the LORD encampeth round about them that fear him, and delivereth them.

The angel of the LORD encampeth round about them that fear him – here we have an absolute description of the characters who are objects of angelic service and ministry – they are “them that fear him” – a perfect description to be found only in “them who shall be heirs of salvation“!

The Jew, therefore, if he be true to the Old Testament Scripture as his rule of judgement, has no right to believe in the notion of every single individual having a guardian angel, for out of his Old Testament Scripture he would read it stated plainly, that they encamp around them that fear the Lord; and the Christian, if in addition to the Old, he takes the New Testament for his guide, he shall find that the notion of every infant or adult having a guardian angel is repugnant to the faith he professes.

Another passage which the advocates of this theory often bring forward to sustain their fable, is Acts 12:15.

Acts 12:15 And they said unto her, Thou art mad. But she constantly affirmed that it was even so. Then said they, It is his angel.

They argue that the early Christians must have believed in the doctrine of a guardian angel, for else, how can we explain their unanimous conclusion that the person knocking on the door of the house wherein they assembled to pray for Peter was not Peter himself, but his angel.

Now, let it be observed keenly that, though, the disciples exclaimed that it was Peter’s angel which stood at the door, they never said it was his guardian angel. Peter’s angel, and Peter’s guardian angel, are two different things. Somehow, to strengthen their course, they have added the word “guardian” and made it read “Peter’s guardian angel.”

Others who believe in the apparition of ghosts, fetch the story from this passage, and make it read, “Peter’s ghosts”; and they teach that the disciples believed that Peter was dead, and his ghost has now come to show himself to them. Alas! Alas! We may say with Mary Magdalene, that they have taken away our Lord, and we wot not where they have laid him.

By Peter’s angel, we may understand that the disciples meant an angel God has sent to rescue Peter, in answer to their earnest prayer on his behalf; and consequently, that this angel has now come to give them words of comfort concerning Peter’s deliverance. This will be very easy for us to understand as soon as we understand that they were gathered together for the singular purpose of praying for Peter’s deliverance. This may be hard to receive, but why may not these hereticks (of ghost apparition and guardian angels), argue that Peter’s angel literally means an angel created by Peter, since the possessive pronoun (his angel) might as well mean an angel created by Peter.

But, whatever the expression (Peter’s angel) might mean, or in whatever sense the early Christians understood it, or whatever was the original intent of those perplexed disciples that uttered those words, we dare not frame a doctrine from such instances, the chief reason being that such utterances were not intended to convey any true doctrine!

Take for example the utterance of our Lord’s disciples when they saw their Lord walking on the water, and coming to them in the storm, they exclaimed, “It is a spirit.”

Matthew 14:26 And when the disciples saw him walking on the sea, they were troubled, saying, It is a spirit; and they cried out for fear.

Can we now take their perplexed and confused utterance, and frame a doctrine from it, whereas we know that it was not a spirit, but the Man Christ Jesus, who was walking on the water to them.

In Matthew 14, the disciples said it was a spirit that came walking on the water, whereas it was not a spirit, but the Man Christ Jesus in flesh and blood; and in Acts 12, the disciples excaimed that it was Peter’s guardian angel (to use the words of these dreamers) which stood at the door, whereas it was not Peter’s guardian angel, but Peter himself! All this serves to prove that any doctrine built on the perplexed words of these fear-stricken disciples must be as false as the words themselves.

The disciples said it was Peter’s angel which stood at the door, and they were wrong; and those who teach a guardian angel from these words are also wrong and false. When they opened the door and saw that it was indeed Peter, they were convinced of their error; and when these dreamers shall open the Scripture with a prayerful and humbled heart, they shall be likewise convinced of their errors. That the Lord will accomplish this work in their life, is our humble petition to him; and the very reason why we have undertaken to lay open their folly, lest others be taken in as well.

********

Advertisements

The Meaning of “When I See The Blood I Will Pass Over You”

We often see stickers and handbills on the doors and windows of some very religious people with these words, “Witches and wizards pass over because this house is covered with the blood of Jesus.” Some others read something like this, “This shop is covered with the blood of Jesus, enemies of progress pass over,” and in the bottom right corner of the sticker, we find this passage of the bible written, Exodus 12:13. Thus, that historic record of the deliverance of the Children of Israel, foreshadowing our salvation, is hijacked and perverted by those who claim they are filled with the Holy Ghost in the same way the Apostles were.

A little thoughtful considering of the text will show that they have no warrant to use it they way they have just done. The blood of the Lamb of God was not shed to thrown about as a magic word or mantra to expel witches and wizards; much less was it shed so that we could have our business and material possessions protected from the assault of our personal enemies.

There is nothing in the text to be interpreted as saying the blood of Jesus covers our doors and houses from witches and wizard; no, the blood of the incarnate Son of God was shed for a far weightier reasons than the protection of our earthly possession and shops. It was not to protect our shops and houses that he shed his blood; but to redeem us from the wrath of God which we deserved by our sins: to deliver us legally from the sentence and condemnation which had come upon us for our sins. The wages of sin is death, and death we deserved; the only remedy from death was that a substitute should die in our place. The only one qualified to be a substitute must be a Godman: one who could both lay his hands on God and on man and reconcile the two parties.

Not angels, for it is not in the nature of angels to redeem any. The work of redemption far exceeded what they could accomplish. They are creatures, and as such they can not act beyond the capability of a creature. Salvation must be the work of the creator, for salvation is of the Lord (Jonah 2:9).

Not fallen man, for in his fallen state, the thought of his own salvation does not enter his mind; he cannot conceive of it in his depraved mind. He cannot pay for his own sins, much less the sins of his brother to redeem his soul from the pit (Psa 49:7).

Salvation originated in the mind and purpose of God before any creature of his was called into existence (Eph 1:4-5; 2 Tim 1:9; 2 Thess 2:13), and he works all the aspects of our salvation to cut off every ground of boasting from us (1 Cor 1:27-31), that all the glory of our salvation may redound to him, who alone is the author and finisher of it (Heb 12:2).

If the blood of the Lamb of God was shed for the security of our shops and businesses, then the Son of God died for something far too cheap; then our temporal, physical estate was more of his concern than the eternal, spiritual estate of our souls. If the words of the above sticker be true, then Christ shed his blood to save our businesses and finances from the enemies of our progress, and what more can we call blasphemy?

Now, let’s examine both the text, and the historical invent surrounding it,

1. The children of Israel had been slaves in Egypt and mistreated by the new king of Egypt. They were his slaves and he could do with them anything he wanted them.

2. They deserved nothing from the hand of God. Whatever good God designed to do to them was not owing to any good in them, but due to his covenant with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob.

3. There is every reason to believe that the children of Israel, at that time, had fallen into the worship of Idolatry, after the death of Joseph and his brothers. It is often the case that when the leader dies, the new generation that would rise who not continue in the way of God: “And also all that generation were gathered unto their fathers: and there arose another generation after them, which knew not the LORD, nor yet the works which he had done for Israel” (Judges 2:10). Even Moses at this time did not yet know the Lord, for when the Lord appeared to him in the burning bush, he asked the Lord, when I come unto the children of Israel, and shall say unto them, The God of your fathers hath sent me unto you; and they shall say to me, What is his name? what shall I say unto them? (Exo 3:13), a clear indication that neither Moses at that time, nor the children of God had any hint as to the knowledge of the true God. God had to introduce himself afresh to them as the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, because they never knew the God that Abraham, Isaac and Jacob served. Let us bear in mind that at this time, all the generation that came from Canaan to Egypt had died, and a new generation of their posterity had risen in their place who knew not God. So the lovingkindness of God to deliver them from their wretchedness and bondage in Egypt was not a reward for anything good they had done. It was simply for the promise God made to their ancestors, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob (Deut 9:4-6).

4. The passover had nothing with witches and wizards passing over the houses of the children of Israel that night: it was not even the devil who was passing over the children of children, but wrath and judgement of God: For the LORD will pass through to smite the Egyptians; and when he seeth the blood upon the lintel, and on the two side posts, the LORD will pass over the door, and will not suffer the destroyer to come in unto your houses to smite you” (Exo 12:23).

5. The passover was not universal in any sense, both in the shadow and in the substance thereof. When men, especially the Pentecostals, speak of the passover blood, they tend to make it universal, by which they try to induce men to belief that the blood of Jesus Christ was shed universally for all; this is a lie. The ordinance of the passover, as was given to Moses in the Land of Egypt was only for the benefit of the Children of Israel of Israel; both the shed blood of the lamb in Egypt and the benefit arising therefrom, was only for the children of Israel, and not one single Egyptian derived a benefit therefrom. We shall turn quickly to the Scriptures and let them speak for themselves, for we are told thus: “To the Law and Testimony, if they speak not according to this word, it is because they have no light in them” (Isa 8:12). If the teaching of any church or any man does not accord to the plain truths of the Scriptures, we are to judge such men as men who are void of the light of God. And so we shall turn to the Scriptures, to see if the Passover Lamb, and the benefits arising from it, was in any way intended for the whole of the residents in the land of Egypt.

Exodus 12:3 – “Speak ye unto all the congregation of Israel, saying, In the tenth day of this month they shall take to them every man a lamb, according to the house of their fathers, a lamb for an house.” According to this passage, the command to take a lamb was not given to everyone in Egypt but only to all the congregation of Israel.

Exodus 12:12 – “For I will pass through the land of Egypt this night, and will smite all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, both man and beast; and against all the gods of Egypt I will execute judgment: I am the LORD.” According to this passage, the Lord would pass through the Land of Egypt that night, and would smite all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, both man and beast, and the reason the wrath and judgement of God would fall on them is not hidden –– because not one soul of the Egyptians had any legal interest in the blood of the lamb; it was not shed for them, neither did the ordinance of the of the Passover in any way comprehend them. When the Pentecostals shout and command the devil’s and witches to see the blood of Jesus and passover, they err in the first place by not understanding that it had nothing to do with the passing over of witches and wizards, as we have explained above; and when they preach and proclaim their passover crusades and meeting, where they anoint people with the oil so the forces of darkness for that month will passover, do they also teach men that the Passover was restricted in design and application only to the congregation of Israel, and not to the Egyptians?

Exodus 12:13 –– “And the blood shall be to you for a token upon the houses where ye are: and when I see the blood, I will pass over you, and the plague shall not be upon you to destroy you, when I smite the land of Egypt.” Here, we see the reason every firstborn in the congregation of Egypt was spared from the plague. It was not owing to anything good in them, nor was it owing to any condition they fulfilled; nay, it was the blood of the lamb which stayed the plague from visiting them. The only thing that made the difference was the presence of the blood upon their door posts and lintels. Such is the Passover described to us in the Bible; it is not anything like the sense the Pentecostals and Charismatics put upon it when they print their stickers and handbills; the Passover of the Bible is distinguishing in nature – it had no respect of persons at all. It did not the prophetic declarations and chantings of “a great anointed man of God to be effectual.”

Exodus 11:7 – “But against any of the children of Israel shall not a dog move his tongue, against man or beast: that ye may know how that the LORD doth put a difference between the Egyptians and Israel.” If there is any difference between one man and another, the difference can only be traced back to the will and sovereign purpose of God; it is the LORD the doth put a difference between the Egyptians and Israel.

The literal Passover in the Land of Egypt was but a shadow of the true Passover of which all the chosen and elect of God were legal beneficiaries; but the substance is Christ and his atoning death on the Cross of Calvary. The Inspired Apostle to the Gentiles would later write in 1 Cor 5:7, “For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us.” Every iota of the literal passover in Egypt found its parallel fulfilment in the Person and Work of Christ.

Was the Passover Lamb in Egypt to be a male, and without blemish? Even so Christ? Even so, Christ was that lamb without blemish and without spot! Let the reader compare Exodus 12:5 without 1 Peter 1:19.

Was the whole assembly of the congregation of Israel to kill the Passover lamb? Even so, let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that that same Jesus, whom they crucified, hath God made both Lord and Christ. Let the reader compare Exodus 12:6 with Acts 2:36.

Did the instruction concerning the Passover lamb in Egypt secure the bones of the Lamb from being broken? Even so was the charge concerning our Lord’s bones, that none of his bones should be broken, which was observed in every detail of it. Exodus 12:46 with John 19:32-36.

Did the instruction concerning the Passover lamb in Egypt include that nothing of it should be left till the morning? So true did this find its fulfilment in the Lord Jesus Christ that his body was not allowed to remain on the cross till the next day, though the Jews, in their wickedness would have naturally done that to him. Compare Exodus 12:10 with John 19:31.

Was the Passover Lamb, in its design and nature, limited to some particular people as the beneficiaries of its blessings? Even so Christ give himself, nor for the world but rather for his church, that he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish (Eph 5:25-27). It was not for the goats and sheep alike he gave his life, but for his sheep alone (John 10:11), and some of among his audience were excluded as goats (John 10:26).

These wonderful facts attending the Passover of the bible distinguishes it from the Passover of the Modern Pentecostals and Charismatics. Theirs is as diametrically opposed to that of the Bible as hell is to heaven.

We can never understand, nor value the historic record of the Passover as written in the Bible but only as we find it fully fulfilled in the Person and Work of Christ for our eternal salvation. The instance we degrade it to a mere magic mantra supposed to drive away witches and wizards from our business premises, we make it a common thing, and rather than appreciating the True Passover Lamb – our Lord Jesus, and falling in love with him, we shall find that we have only sought to use his religion and the truth surrounding his glorious death and resurrection as a means to our selfish and earthly prosperity.

Writing it upon our offices and door posts, and proclaiming it as a mantra, that “our business premises is covered with the blood of Jesus”, or that “witches and wizards should see the blood of Jesus on our doorpost and pass over” may sound good in the ear; yea, it may gratify the itching ears of every nominal Christian, but when we weigh such expressions on the balances of Holy Writ, we shall find them wanting and full of blasphemy; and shall soon discover how we have neglected that which was the chief design of Christ dying on the Cross, namely, for the eternal salvation of our souls.

Therefore, Let the reader have in him a jealousy for the God of the Bible from today henceforth, and a sincere love for the atoning blood of Christ, so that whenever he hears or reads such blasphemous words on stickers and flyers from the Pentecostals and Charismatic, his spirit will be stirred within him to flee from such expressions, and not be a partaker in their evil deeds.

Why do many use the anointing oil

  1. 1. Because men’s hearts are naturally inclined to idolatry and superstitions.
  2. Because idolatry practised in the name of Christianity easily commends itself to the taste of all men.
  3. Because natural faith, which is the faith common to all men, seeks something on which it can lean upon: something that the natural eyes can see; whereas, special faith, which is the faith of God’s elect (Titus 1:1), seeks nothing to lean upon which is perceptible to the natural eyes; the faith of natural men walk by sight, but the faith of God’s elect does not walk by sight.
  4. Because lies told in the name of Bible Christianity is easily received for truth and hard to detect.
  5. Because God promised to blind men and rewire them to believe a lie that they might be damned, seeing they received not the love of the truth (2 Thess 2:11-12).
  6. Because God promised to give men over to their own heart’s lusts (Psa 81:12).
  7. Because Satan loves to imitate the truth; the Apostles used the anointing oil to heal the sick in Mark 6:13, and Satan wants seeks to imitate the same.
  8. Because we live in the perilous times of the lasts days when men shall prefer fables to sound doctrine, and carnal worshippers shall seek out false, effeminate, seeker-sensitive, teachers to scratch their itching ears (2 Tim 4:3-4).
  9. Because Satan, through the prosperity gospel of the Pentecostals and Charismatics, have preoccupied men with the care of the state of their body, while they never care about the state of the souls.
  10. Because men love magic, and would readily receive it if it is now practised in the name of the Bible and in the name of Jesus Christ.
  11. Because men count the longsuffering of God as slackness and delay (2 Pet 3:9)
  12. Because Pentecostals and Charismatics think the Holy Ghost is contained in the bottle of the anointing oil, just as the Pope and his groupies think the body, soul, and divinity of the Lord Jesus Christ are contained in the bread and wine of the communion.
  13. Because broad is the way that leadeth to destruction and many there be that go in thereat; but strait is the gate and narrow is the way that leadeth to life, and few there be that find it Matt 7:13-14).

Continue reading

Something better than the anointing oil

It is the way of the natural man to neglect the best of the gifts of God to settle for the least, and even believers tend to do this since they still carry their depraved nature in them. This seems to be the case of the Corinthian church; they were settling for the gifts of tongues, which was by far the least of the spiritual gifts, hence Paul told them: “But covet earnestly the best gifts: and yet shew I unto you a more excellent way” (1 Cor 12:31).

In our time there seems to be more and more men settling down for the use of the anointing oil, which is by far an outdated gift, and also very irrelevant to the saints today. God has given us something far better and superior than the anointing oil. We are not left as orphans in this world, nor have we been left defenceless in our war against sin, the flesh and the world. This article will show that God has given to his saints something better than the anointing oil.

While the Lord Jesus Christ tabernacled in the flesh among us, his disciples were never perplexed nor troubled; the thought of their vulnerability to the powers of darkness never entered into their hearts because they found a sure refuge in him. In Matthew 14:23-33 they witnessed him walk over the water and rescue them from the boisterious storm; in Mark 4:37-41 they witnessed him rebuke the wind and the sea and they yielded perfect obedience to him, such that they said with their own mouth, “What manner of man is this, that Continue reading

Examining the use of the anointing oil

God has given to his church a wonderful gift, a precious gift, something greater than the anointing oil. At the mention of the name of Jesus Christ every name, and every knee shall bow. In spite of this wonderful gift that God has given us, many people continue to use what they call “spiritual materials” in their prayers and worship to God. This article will examine the use of the anointing oil throughout the several dispensations of the Bible times.

God permitted the use of the anointing oil in the ceremonial and religious activities for the children of Israel under the old covenant until the fullness of the time should come when we would have a clearer light shining through a complete Scripture.

In the Old Testament, the anointing oil was used in some occasions, such as when a new King was anointed to assume the throne (1 Sam 16:13; Psa 89:20, 1 Kings 1:38-39), and during the consecration of the priests to their priestly office and duties (Exo 29:7-21) etc.

Several miracles and signs and wonders were performed in the Old Testament which did not involve the use of the anointing oil, because the anointing oil was not given for the purpose of initiating miracles. The deliverance of the children of Israel from bondage in Egypt, the parting of the Red Sea, the miraculous provisions of manna, meat, and water for the multitudes of the children of Israel in the wilderness, the crossing of the River Jordan, and the possession of the promised land did not involve a single use of the anointing oil. The miracles that occurred during the reigns of the judges, such as Gideons victory over the Midianites, Samsons victory over the Philistians, Jepthah’s victory over the Ammonites, (and so on) did not involve a single use of the anointing oil.

If we come down to the times of the prophets in the Old Testament, we shall find that the miracles that were performed under their ministry did not involve a single use of the anointing oil.

When Elijah put the prophets of Baal to open shame on Continue reading

You must be born again…but how?

Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.” John 3:7

Jesus told one of the most religious men of his day named Nicodemus that he must be BORN AGAIN (John 3:3). This being born again is generally known as the NEW BIRTH (John 3:1-8). It is the only doorway into the kingdom of God, the only escape from the wrath of God soon to come, the strait gate and the narrow way that leads to life which very few find (Matthew 7:13,14). The new birth is the only cure for man’s sinful nature and lusts. It is the only solution the sinner needs; the single dose therapy that can keep him out of hell; and whoever keeps this all-important truth from men is an enemy of their soul, and any preacher or author who corrupts the doctrine of the new birth is to be dreaded as a deadly cancer.

Every sinner is under the wrath of God, whether he believes it or not. A holy God must punish sin and destroy sinners.

Many a sinner do not sense God’s wrath and impending judgement upon them because Satan has blinded them, and YOU, my reader, might be one of them, thinking all is well with your soul, but sooner than you expect death sweeps you into hell. Do not flatter yourself. Do not think all is well. There is a HOLY GOD in heaven that must punish sin and those practising it. Only a fool says in his heart that there is no God (Psalm 53:1).

Many preachers and churches do not preach this truth, and even when they do, they pervert it. Some preach that the NEW BIRTH is water baptism, others say it is Holy Ghost baptism and speaking in tongues, and others say it is “making a decision for Jesus” and praying the sinner’s prayer. All of these man-made opinions mentioned fall short of what the bible calls the NEW BIRTH. Continue reading

What Is This Beggar Doing At The Door?

A “jesus” or a “saviour” seeking your decision and permission before he saves you is the most ridiculous lie and delusion the corrupt mind of fallen man ever came up with.

Will you sell your eternal destiny to this beggarly, effeminate hippie, who begs decisions  and sinner’s prayers from door to door; or will you trust the finished work of the Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of the Living God, which saved all for whom it was wrought?

arminian-jesus-threatening-at-door

Salvation must be by the work of Christ Alone, by His decision alone, and by his choice alone; without that, Grace is corrupted, and the sinner becomes his own Saviour.

Matthew 1:21: “And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins.”

Provoking Questions

“And she shall bring forth a son”: Did Mary bring forth a Son? Yes!

“And thou shalt call his name JESUS”: Was His named called JESUS? Yes!

“For he shall save his people from their sins”: Did He save His people from their sin? Hmmm…(Here is the heart of the Gospel, and this is why many show openly that they don’t believe the truth as stated in Matthew 1:21, concerning what Christ would accomplish by His death on the cross).

We who have come out of the Pentecostal Religion believe with all our heart that Mary had a Son named Jesus, and that He saved ALL His people from their sins!

There are three “shall” in Matthew 1:21.

“And she <<SHALL>> bring forth a son, and thou <<SHALT>> call his name JESUS: for he <<SHALL>> save his people from their sins.”

The last “shall” is no less certain than the first two! Get it!

Which Comes First? Christ or Antichrist?

II Thessalonians 2:

1 Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him,

2 That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.

3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;

4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.

Paul’s Order of Events by Holy Spirit Inspiration

1. A falling away from the true gospel.

2. Antichrist, the Man of Sin, revealed.

3. Jesus Christ’s Second Coming for His saints.

Deceivers Who Reverse the Order of the Holy Spirit

Tim LaHaye

Hal Lindsey

Billy Graham

Bob Jones

C.I. Scofield

Clarence Larkin

Benny Hinn Continue reading

Providence is Remarkable

By Phil Johnson

From http://www.gty.org/resources/sermons/TM13-15/providence-iisi-remarkable-phil-johnson
Used here with permission.

A PDF version of this lecture is available here.

One of the underlying presuppositions of the Charismatic world is that if God is not actively intervening in creation through miracles and signs and wonders and things like that, then you’ve got an absentee God.  If we don’t take the Charismatic position, they say, your God isn’t really there.  Charismatics frequently lob this charge at non-Charismatics, that, you know, if you believe the miraculous Charismatic gifts have ceased, they say, then your view is a close cousin of deism, which is virtually a denial that God is present and at work in this world’s affairs.  If you doubt whether today’s Charismatics are truly speaking in tongues, and getting direct revelation from God, they will tell you that your skepticism is tantamount to materialistic rationalism.  It’s essentially a form of rank unbelief. That’s because the only way the typical Charismatic can envision God as active and personal is as if He is constantly displaying His presence in creation by miraculous means, you know, through constant, direct extra-biblical revelation or with supernatural signs and wonders in the heavens.  And they think if He’s not doing that, then He’s not there.

Continue reading